Under Section 41A, the offence under this Act are made cognizable and non-bailable. The concoction was prepared by accused Vijayan, Suresh, Monkuttan and Rasool. Since that was causing difficulty, an Ordinance came to be promulgated on 01. We accordingly dismiss the appeal filed by A-30 with the modification in the sentence as indicated. Officers of the mobile companies were also examined. In fact vide the question numbers 51, 63, 131, 141,143, 219, 220, 221, 224, 263, 691, 692, 706 and 709 and, more particularly, question No.
. It is significant to note that if, as a result of such act of mixing of the liquor with noxious or dangerous substance death is caused, the extreme penalty of death also is provided. Each of them who join the act with such knowledge or intension is liable in the same way as if it were done by him alone with that intention or knowledge. Mohan is the deputy Director of Income Tax who conducted the raid along with others. Those who were convicted by the Sessions Judge were awarded sentences depending upon the seriousness of the crime as per the classifications which have been shown above. It directs the State to promote their rights within the framework of national unity.
It was brought by Anil Kumar A-16 in a Fiat car which had fake registration number. It audit survey exposes weak risk assessment. He described that the spirit was brought from Karnataka and essence used to come on Thursdays in a white Fiat car. If me and wife and hv small debate in house hold things. Further the Court also referred to C.
We also found no instance of inadmissible evidence having been accepted or some material evidence having been ignored by the Courts below. This was replaced by a Bill and that is how Abkari Act was born. There were laboratories, assistants and labourers. Appellant Versus State of Kerala. On the other hand, we find that the evidence has been meticulously appreciated by both the Trial and the appellate Court.
Emperor Amdumiyan and others v. Some of these number plates related to some of the vehicles recovered from the premises i. The internal arrangements of the business with other accused persons were also discussed and also the financial aspects. The prosecution alleged against him that A-7 was doing the business in liquor in the name of a firm called Ushus Traders. The Section was also criticized for the excess of proportionality for imposition of sentence. Physical security protects the organization in every way. Shri Radhakrishnan also did not contest this position.
He then went on to depose that the employees of A-4, namely, A-5, A-6, A-9 and A-10 came there with three vehicles and essence and they mixed up the essence with the spirit. A-25 was selling liquor in retail through A-32, A-35 etc. His vehicles were found to be fitted with additional spring leaves and it was obvious that they were being used for carrying spurious liquor. Nd by listening them she fights wid me she has stop doing house hold work. Durant 6 Akhoy Kumar Mookerjee v. Here was a person who was unabashedly running his empire of spurious liquor trade and for that purpose had purchased politicians including the public representatives, police officers and other officers belonging to the Excise Department. He thus, went to Chirayankeezhu in the car having registration No.
The prosecution suggests 9that later on he died. Most of the cross-examination was stereotyped, limiting to the minor omissions in his statement under Section 161 and 164 Cr. We have already explained the real scope of Section 57A. With increasing globalization of capital markets there is demand for a transparent accounting standard that will allow investors, management, and governments to seek clarity in reporting financial transactions. The High Court also referred to analysis of cotton swabs collected from this place which showed that there was methyl alcohol.
The High Court has noted the further argument that the detection of methyl alcohol from the trace evidence was not possible. It was then mixed by the workers of A-4 with the ethyl alcohol. The liquid in this closet which was having smell of liquor was collected and it was established that it contained methyl alcohol. Lastly, the learned counsel argued that there is no clear finding for the complicity under Section 120B, Indian Penal Code. The High Court has then proceeded to believe the evidence that the cans which were having the illicit liquor duly mixed with methyl alcohol were removed from the godown and for this purpose has relied upon the evidence of C. However, it cannot be said that his conviction under Section 57A 2 is incorrect on that count.